Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of the research is to analyze the performance of KUD Karya Mina Tegal with Balanced Scorecard. Data collection method used in this research is questionnaire. Performance of KUD Karya Mina Tegal is viewed from a financial perspective using Profitability ratio instrument consisting of current ratio, return on investment, and net profit margin. Of the three instruments, only the current ratio is in accordance with the standard, while return on investment and net profit margin is still below the specified standard. Performance of KUD Karya Mina Tegal from customer perspective with member satisfaction indicator and member acquisition in good category. This can be seen from the increasing trend seen from the increase in the number of members each year as well as from the increased percentage increase in member acquisition. The performance of KUD Karya Mina Tegal is viewed from the internal perspective of the business with indicators of innovation and operation is considered good. Viewed from how KUD Karya mina is able to see the needs of its members and provide additional benefits to the members. The performance of KUD Karya Mina from learning and growth perspective with employee satisfaction indicator, employee retention and employee training is considered good. In the indicator of employee satisfaction, employees feel satisfied in working in KUD Karya Mina Tegal. For employee retention from year to year decreased, this can be interpreted that KUD Karya Mina Tegal able to retain its employees. And for employee training seen from the increasing trend every year. The results of the overall performance measurement of KUD Karya Mina Tegal is in good area, with a total score of 86,66% . That is, the performance of KUD Karya Mina Tegal good if measured by Balanced Scorecard approach.

Keywords

Performance Measurement Balanced Scorecard

Article Details

How to Cite
Prakoso, F. A., & Tabrani. (2017). Analisis Balanced Scorecard Sebagai Alat Pengukur Kinerja. Permana : Jurnal Perpajakan, Manajemen, Dan Akuntansi, 9(1), 51-68. Retrieved from https://permana.upstegal.ac.id/index.php/permana/article/view/138

References

  1. Aditya, A., Indra, G.N. 2010. “Penilaian Kinerja Dengan Perspektif Balanced Scorecard Pada CV. Sri Keshava Madhusudana”. E-Jurnal Akuntansi. 5(3), 599613.
  2. Devita Puteri Wardani, B Hari Susanta. 2012. “Analisis Balanced Scorecard Pada Koperasi Karyawan Krama Yudha Motor Jakarta”. Jurnal Administrasi bisnis. Administrasti.bisnis@undip.co.id.
  3. Ferawati, I.K. 2013. “Penerapan Balanced Scorecard Sebagai Tolak Ukur Penilaian Kinerja Pada Perusahaan Daerah Air Minum Banyuwangi”. Analisa Vol.1. No.3. Desember hal : 135-153.
  4. Kasmir. 2015. Pengantar Manajemen Keuangan. Jakarta: Renada Media Grup.
  5. Mahsun, M. 2013. Pengukuran Kinerja Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
  6. Mardiasmo. 2002. Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta: Andi.
  7. Mulyadi. 2014. Sistem Terpadu Pengelolaan Kinerja Personel Berbasis BALANCED SCORECARD. Yogyakarta : UPP STIM YKPN.
  8. Nugrahayu, E.R. 2016. “Penerapan Metode Balanced Scorecard Sebagai Tolak Ukur Pengukuran Kinerja Perusahaan”. Jurnal Ilmu dan Riset Akuntansi 4(10).
  9. Nurjaman, S. 2013. “Pengukuran Kinerja dengan Metode Balanced Scorecard”. Jurnal Trikonomika voume 12, No. 2, Desember 2013, Hal. 113-124.ISSN1411-514X.
  10. Oktia, Desy. 2014. “Pengukuran Kinerja Perusahaan Daerah Air Minum Kabupaten Tegal Dengan Balanced Scorecard”.
  11. Padmakusumah, R.R. 2012. “Analisis Perkembangan Kinerja Koperasi Mahasiswa di Kota Bandung Dengan Menggunakan Pendekatan Balanced Scorecard”. Forum Manajemen Indonesia ke 4. Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Islam Indonesia.
  12. Putrayasa, I. M. A. 2011. “Pengukuran Kinerja Ditinjau Dari Empat Perspektif Balanced Scorecard Pada Koperasi Martha Yasa Di Desa Penarungan. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Kewirausahaan”. Vol 7 No 3, Nopember 2011.
  13. Rangkuti, F. (2011). SWOT Balanced Scorecard Tehnik Menyusun Strategi Korporat yang Efektif plus Cara Mengelola Kinerja dan Risiko. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  14. Rivai, V 2004. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Untuk Perusahaan Dari Teori ke Praktik. Jakarta : PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
  15. Rowley, C dan Keith Jackson 2012. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta : PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
  16. Sagala, R. Br dkk. 2016. “Kinerja Koperasi Unit Desa (KUD) Wenang Ditinjau Dari Balanced Scorecard”. Agri-Sosio Ekonomi Unsrat, ISSN 1907-4298, Vol. 12. No.3A. November 2016: 81-94.
  17. Sari, A. P dan Retnani. 2015. “Penerapan Balanced Scorecard Sebagai Alat Pengukuran Kinerja Pada Rumah Sakit Islam Surabaya”. Jurnal Ilmu dan Riset Akuntansi.
  18. Satriyadi, I. 2015. “Pengukuran Kinerja Berbasis Balanced Scorecard pada koperasi pegawai PT. TELKOM (KOPEGTEL) Insan Denpasar”. E-Jurnal Akuntansi. 11(3), 828-847.
  19. Sekaran, Uma. 2006. Research Methods for Business. Jakarta: Salemba Empat Sekaran, Uma. 2011. Research Methods for Business. Jakarta: Salemba Empat
  20. Sugiyono. 2014. Statistika untuk Penelitian. Bandung:Alfabeta.
  21. Sulisworo, D dan Nurmaningsih, S. 2011. “Pembobotan Sasaran Strategis Perspektif Balanced Scorecard Pada Perusahaan Air Minum”. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Industri, Vol.10, No.1, Juni 2011.
  22. Tajudin, K., & Adi, R. K. 2013. “Analisis Balanced Scorecard Terhadap Kinerja KUD Susu Getasan Kabupaten Semarang”. E-Jurnal AGRISTA, 1-12.