Main Article Content

Abstract

Technological advances have an impact on aspects of life. The emergence of technological finance in online loans makes it easy to get the desired funds in a short and easy process. There are many cases of illegal fintech that we can see in national and international media. One example is the case of the VLoan application owned by PT Vcard Technology Indonesia. The purpose of this research is to see and analyze the role of the Financial Services Authority in preventing illegal activities in society, because the rampant illegal fintech in society is certainly detrimental to several parties. This research uses qualitative research with high-performance qualitative analysis application tools, namely NVivo 12. Based on the research results, the role of the Financial Services Authority in preventing illegal fintech by means of education and socialization has been effective. Obstacles in preventing illegal fintech, namely the low level of public understanding of online loans, low levels of financial literacy. This research is also expected to be a relevant source for the future.


Keyword: Finansial Teknologi Illegal, Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, Pencegahan Fraud

Keywords

Finansial Teknologi Illegal Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Pencegahan Fraud

Article Details

How to Cite
Firmansyah, F., Kartikasari, M. D., Sujarwo, M., Raharjo, T. B., & Rahmatika, D. N. (2022). Peran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Dalam Pencegahan Fintech Illegal di Masyarakat. Permana : Jurnal Perpajakan, Manajemen, Dan Akuntansi, 14(1), 168-179. https://doi.org/10.24905/permana.v14i1.215

References

  1. Abdullahi. (2015). Fraud prevention initiatives in the Nigerian Public Sector: Understanding the relationship of fraud incidences and the elements of fraud triangle theory. Journal of Financial Crime. https://doi.org/10.24036/wra.v7i2.106950
  2. Albrecht, (2011). Fraud Examination (4 ed). Mason, Ohio: Cengage Learning
  3. Amin, M. A. N. (2020). Apakah Stock Split Memberikan Keuntungan Tidak Normal? Permana: Jurnal Perpajakan, Manajemen, Dan Akuntansi, 12(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24905/permana.v12i1.90
  4. Amin, M. A. N. (2022). Analisis Potensi Abnormal Return Positif Terbesar Saham PT. Kalbe Farma Selama Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Valuasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Manajemen Dan Kewirausahaan, 2(February 2021), 223–233. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46306/vls.v2i1.93
  5. Amin, M. A. N., & Irawan, B. P. (2021). Apakah Buyback Stock dapat memberikan Keuntungan Tidak Normal saat Pandemi ? PERMANA, 13(1), 46–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24905/permana.v13i1.159
  6. Amin, M. A. N., & Ramdhani, D. (2017). Analysis of Abnormal Return, Stock Return and Stock Liquidity Before And After Buyback Share: Case Study of Companies Listed In Indonesia Stock Exchange In Period of 2011-2015. Rjoas, 11(November), 312–323. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18551/rjoas.2017-11.37
  7. Budiastanti, D. E. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Penipuan Melalui Internet. Jurnal Hukum, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.24036/wra.v7i2.107176
  8. Pramitha, A (2020). Upaya Hukum Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) Dalam Mengatasi Layanan Pinjaman Online Ilegal. Acta Comitas, 5(1), 111. https://doi.org/10.24036/wra.v7i2.106951
  9. Saleh, M. (2011). Effect of internal control on fraud prevention of the listed manufacturing industries in Nigeria. Journal International of Business and Management, 12(1), 1733–3550. https://doi.org/10.24036/wra.v7i2.106949
  10. Suroso, (2011). Pencegahan dan pendeteksian kecurangan dalam perusahaan oleh internal auditor. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis dan Publik Program Studi Akuntansi FE UNPAB Medan, 2(1).
  11. Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2011 tentang Otoritas Jasa Keuangan.
  12. Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 1998 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1992 tentang Perbankan.
  13. Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2008 tentang Perbankan Syariah.