Main Article Content

Abstract

Green sukuk must be appropriate with the stock criteria enforced by the principles of Islamic Jurisprudence (Sharia). Equity through three basic selections: sources of income, business activities, and financial factors to be recognized as Islamic stocks. However, the screening criteria can not apply universally especially to financial factors. Investor use financial ratios based on the book value of total assets or market value of the company to make a selection. This results criterion not only in different portofolio composition but also requires a variety of offsets and monitoring costs. The performance of 11 green sukuk from the JII main index using environmentally sharia screening criteria is analyzed in a multi-equation framework. Multi-equation framework have advantage of utilizing information from screening different criteria. These empirical findings indicate that differences in screening criteria do not significantly affect the green sukuk performance. If there is return that deviates from the risk of green sukuk. It is necessary to streamline quantitative screening criteria to avoid confusion among investing communities.

Keywords

Green Sukuk Sustainable Development Criteria Performance Measurement

Article Details

How to Cite
Luthfi Rahmawati Nur Hasanah. (2019). Apakah Green Sukuk Menyebabkan Pengembalian Tidak Normal?. Permana : Jurnal Perpajakan, Manajemen, Dan Akuntansi, 11(2), 187-206. https://doi.org/10.24905/permana.v11i2.29

References

  1. Ashraf, Dawood. 2016. Does Shari’ah Screening Cause Abnormal Returns?: Empirical Evidence from Islamic Equity Indices. J Bus Ethics (2016) 134:209–228. Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014.
  2. Azman, Syed Marwan Mujahid bin Syed dan Engku Rabiah Adawiah Engku Ali. 2016. Potential Role of Social Impact Bond and Socially Responsible Investment Sukuk as Financial Tools that Can Help Address Issues of Poverty and Socio-Economic Insecurity. Intellectual Discourse, Special Issue (2016) 343–364.
  3. Fatimatuzzahra, Vita dan Leo Herlambang. 2014. Reaksi Pasar Atas Penerbitan Sukûk (Studi Pada Emiten Saham Penerbit Sukûk Periode 2008-2012). JESTT Vol. 1 No. 5 Mei (2014).
  4. Hakim, S., & Rashidian, M. 2004. Risk & return of Islamic Stock Market Indexes. In Forum Annual Conference in Sharjah, UAE. (Online) http://www.iefpedia.com, diakses pada 11 Juni 2019,.
  5. Hanafi, Mamduh M. 2016. Manajemen Keuangan Edisi 2. Yogyakarta: BPFE
  6. Hidayat, Taufik. 2011. Buku Pintar Investasi Syariah. Jakarta: mediakita.
  7. Huberman, G., & Kandel, S. (1987). Mean-variance Spanning. Journal of Finance, 42, 873–888.
  8. Kwoun, Young Man, Mohamad Hamzi Abdul Azziz, dan Kyung Nam Kim. 2018. Penelitian tentang Keuangan Hijau Islam: Memahami Sukuk Hijau dengan Studi Kasus Proyek LSS Energi Tadau. New & Renewable Energy 2018. 6 Vol. 14, No. 2. ISSN 1738-3935.
  9. Marwan, Syed dan Prof. Dr. Engku Rabiah Adawiah Engku Ali. 2016. The Potential of Innovative Financial Tools: Social Impact Bond (SIB) and Sustainable and Responsible Investment (SRI) sukuk, Towards The Sustainable Growth of The Islamic Finance Industry. EJIF – European Journal of Islamic Finance. No 4, March (2016). ISSN 2421-2172.
  10. Morea, Donato dan Luigi Antonio Poggi. 2017. An Innovative Model for the Sustainability of Investments in the Wind Energy Sector: The Use of Green Sukuk in an Italian Case Study. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 2017, 7(2), 53-60. ISSN: 2146-4553. JEL Classifications: Q420, L940, P480.
  11. Naifar, Nader. 2018. Exploring the Dynamic Links between GCC Sukuk and Commodity Market Volatility. International Journal of Financial Studies, 2018, 6, 72.
  12. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK). 2019. Peraturan Nomor II.K.1 tentang Kriteria dan Penerbitan Daftar Efek Syariah. (Online) www.ojk.go.id, diakses pada 15 Juni 2019.
  13. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK). 2019. POJK No.60/POJK.04/2017 Penerbitan dan Persyaratan Efek Bersifat Utang Berwawasan Lingkungan. (Online) www.ojk.go.id, diakses pada 15 Juni 2019.
  14. Rahim, Siti Rohaya Mat dan Zam Zuriyati Mohamad. 2018. Green Sukuk for Financing Renewable Energy Projects. TUJISE (Turkish Journal of Islamic Economics), 5 (2), 2018, 129-144. Research Center for Islamic Economics.
  15. Schroder, M. 2007. Is there a difference? The Performance Characteristics of SRI Equity Indices. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 34(1–2), 331–348.
  16. SIARAN PERS Kuala Lumpur, 8 November 2017. Regulator Pasar Modal Luncurkan Standar Green Bond ASEAN untuk Pacu Investasi Berkesinambungan.
  17. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). 2019. Towards a Sustainable Financial System in Indonesia: The UNEP Inquiry Into the Design of a Sustainable Financial System. (Online) https://www.ojk.go.id, diakses pada 28 Maret 2019.
  18. Zellner, A. (1962). An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regression and Tests for Aggregation Bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 57(298), 348–368.
  19. https://finance.yahoo.com/, diakses pada 11 Juni 2019
  20. https://www.idx.co.id/, diakses pada 11 Juni 2019
  21. https://www.ojk.go.id, diakses pada 28 Maret 2019
  22. https://market.bisnis.com/read/20181010/92/847518/green-sukuk-instrumen-investasi-pembangunan-berkelanjutan, diakses pada 29 Maret 2019
  23. https://www.republika.co.id/berita/ekonomi/keuangan/18/10/09/pgbpni370-green-sukuk-tetap-jadi-andalan-di-2019, diakses pada 29 Maret 2019.
  24. https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/blog/2018/Indonesias-green-sukuk.html, diakses pada 29 Maret 2019.
  25. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20190214155316-532-369338/pemerintah-terbitkan-green-sukuk-global-us-2-miliar, diakses pada 29 Maret 2019.
  26. Green Financing, Sukuk.pdf “Green Financing, Sukuk Negara dan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan.” (Eri Hariyanto, Ahli Madya Pusdiklat Keuangan Umum BPPK)
  27. roadmap-keuangan-berkelanjutan-sarana-berinovasi-ljk.pdf
  28. Siaran Pers 112.pdf