Article Sidebar

Submitted
Jun 28, 2023
Accepted
Jul 12, 2023
Published
Jul 12, 2023
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Main Article Content

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui adanya pengaruh need for touch terhadap purchase intention di moderasi positive emotional states. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah konsumen The Ava Store. Teknik penentuan sampel yang digunakan adalah purposive sampling dengan mengambil 90 responden. Pengumpulan data melalui penyebaran kuesioner. Metode validitas dan reliabilitas menggunakan SPSS versi 21 for Windows dan SmartPLS versi 3.0. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Need For Touch berpengaruh positif terhadap Purchase Intention. Positive Emotional States memoderasi pengaruh Need For Touch dan Purchase Intention


 


 

Keywords

kebutuhan akan sentuhan niat beli keadaan emosi positif

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Licensed under Creative Commons License a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

How to Cite
Ikin, P. F., & Laily Muzdhalifah. (2023). Kebutuhan akan Sentuhan dan Niat Membeli: Peran Pemoderasi Keadaan Emosional Positif di Ava Store. Permana : Jurnal Perpajakan, Manajemen, Dan Akuntansi, 15(2), 200-213. https://doi.org/10.24905/permana.v15i2.308

References

  1. Agustian, I., Saputra, H. E., & Imanda, A. (2019). Pengaruh Sistem Informasi Manajamen Terhadap Peningkatan Kualitas Pelayanan Di Pt. Jasaraharja Putra Cabang Bengkulu. Profesional: Jurnal Komunikasi dan Administrasi Publik, 6(1), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.37676/professional.v6i1.837
  2. Fonzo, N., & Bordia, P. (2013). Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner . Further reproduction prohibited without. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 130(2), 556. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2012.05.050
  3. Ghozali, I. (2014). Structural Equation Modeling Metode Alternatif dengan Partial Least Squares (PLS).
  4. Peck, J., & Childers, T. L. (2012). Individual Differences in Haptic Information Processing: The “Need for Touch” Scale. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(3), 430–442. https://doi.org/10.1086/378619
  5. Ringler, C., Sirianni, N. J., Gustafsson, A., & Peck, J. (2019). Look but Don’t Touch! The Impact of Active Interpersonal Haptic Blocking on Compensatory Touch and Purchase Behavior. Journal of Retailing, 95(4), 186–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2019.10.007
  6. Ryan, Cooper, & Tauer. (2013). Purchase Intention. Paper Knowledge . Toward a Media History of Documents, 2015, 12–26.
  7. Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D (Sutopo (ed.); 2 ed.). Alfabeta.
  8. Vieira, V. A. (2013). The association between need for touch and desire for unique products and consumer (inter)dependent problem-solving. Revista de Administração, 48(3), 481–499. https://doi.org/10.5700/rausp1101
  9. Zhang, E. M. (2010). Understanding the Acceptance of Mobile SMS Advertising among Young Chinese Consumers. Psychology & Marketing, 30(6), 461–469. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar
  10. Zheng, L., & Bensebaa, F. (2022). Need for touch and online consumer decision making: the moderating role of emotional states. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 50(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-04-2020-0158