Main Article Content

Abstract

The State Civil Apparatus (ASN) must have the value of integrity so that it can pre­ve­nt itself from attempts to abuse power or authority. Instilling the values of integrity and anti-corruption must be done as early as possible. Instilling the value of integrity from an early age makes government officials understand better that actions that conflict with the value of in­tegrity are actions that are detrimental to the state. This value of integrity also directs ASN to act consistently and firmly in upholding the noble values and principles of life that it up­ho­l­ds. The subjectsiof thisistudy were BKPSDMD Civil Servants of Brebes Regencyiand the Head of General Affairs and Personnel Subdivision. Methods of data collection using a ques­tio­nnaire. Test the validity and reliability using SEM (Structural Equation Modeling). The influence of performance accountability (X1), digitization of services (X2), bureaucratic re­fo­rm (X3) and work commitment (Z) on integrity (Y) can be identified using regression techniques. Testing the mediation hypothesis can be done with the Sobel Test. The results of this study are expected to provide advice for the Brebes district government in providing ef­fec­tive handling that is able to solve existing problems and improve the integrity of ASN, so that ASN will be more optimal in carrying out their duties because they have good integrity.

Keywords

Integrity Performance Accountability Service Digitization Bureaucratic Reform Work Commitment

Article Details

How to Cite
Maulida, M. C., Gunistiyo, & Jalil, M. (2021). The Influence of Performance Accountability, Service Digitalization, Bureaucratic Reform on ASN Integrity through Work Commitment as a Mediation Variable in the Regional Personnel and Human Resource Development Agency in Brebes Regency. Permana : Jurnal Perpajakan, Manajemen, Dan Akuntansi, 13(1), 139-145. Retrieved from https://permana.upstegal.ac.id/index.php/permana/article/view/314

References

  1. Asif M, iQing M, Hwang J, Shi H. (2019) EthicaliLeadership,iAffective Commitment, WorkiEngagement, and Creativity: Testingiia Multiple Mediation Approach. Sustainability 2019;11:1–16.
  2. Beloor V, Nanjundeswaraswamy T, DR S. (2017) Employee Commitment and Quality of Work Life. The International Journal of Indian Psychology 2017;4:175–188.
  3. Darwin K. (2021) PerformanceiAccountability ThroughiInternal Control Systemiand Reporting System. Point of View Research Accounting and Auditing 2021;2:236–243.
  4. Demmke C. (2020) Public Administration Reform over Time – Did Change Lead to a More Effective Integrity Management? Central European Public Administration Review 2020;18:7–27.
  5. Hehamahua A. (2019) Integrity Sows Honesty, Reaps Success and Happiness. Yogyakarta: The Phinisi Press Yogyakarta; 2019.
  6. Huberts L. (2018) Integrity:iWhat it is and Why it is Important.iPublic Integrity 2018;20:18– 32.
  7. Jannatun A, W EM, Fajri RN. (2021) The Influence of Application of Information Systems on Integrity. J Econ Bus 2021;5:260–265.
  8. Kettani D, Moulin B. (2014) E-government for good governance in developing countries: Empirical evidence from the eFez project. London: Anthem Press; 2014.
  9. Matsiliza N, Zonke N. (2017) Accountability and Integrity as Unique Column of Good Governance. Public and Municipal Finance 2017;6:75–82.
  10. Pratama PE, Kamil M, Salahudin. (2019) Implementationiof The IntegrityiZone DevelopmentiiProgram Towards aiiCorruption-Free Area and a ServingiClean Bureaucracy Region. Journal of Local Government Issues (LOGOS 2019;2:134–148.
  11. Private U. (2021) Bureaucratic Reform, Public Service Performance, and Citizens Satisfaction. Public Policy Adm 2021;20:312–326.
  12. Quiston MJ, Manoharan PA. (2020) E-Government and information technology coursework in public administration programs in Assist. Teaching Public Administration 2020;XX:1–17.
  13. Wibowo AY, Gamarefa T, Angraeni S, Partohap TH, Susilo WD, Wijayanti A, et al. (2021) Integrity Assessment Survey. Corruption Eradication Commission. Jakarta: KPK; 2021.