Article Sidebar

Submitted
Jan 9, 2020
Published
Aug 31, 2018
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Main Article Content

Abstract

The effect of financial stability, financial targets, level of performance, asset turnover ratio, audit committee's financial expertise, and profitability to fraudulent financial statement. Essay. Tegal : Faculty of Economics and Business. Pancasakti University Tegal 2018. This study aims to obtain empirical evidence and to analyze the effect of financial stability, financial targets, level of performance, asset turnover ratio, audit committee's financial expertise, and profitbility to fraudulent financial statement which measured using fraud score model (F-Score). The data in this research uses secondary data which form the company's financial statement and annual report. The population in this study are all companies listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange in period 20142017. This study uses purposive sampling method to select sample from the population and obtained sample of 28 companies of consumer goods industries. The methode of data analysis is performed with classic assumption test, descriptive statistics analysis and hypothesis tested by multiple linear regression analysis with SPSS version 23. The results of this study shows that the financial targets and level of performance significantly to the fraudulent financial statement, however the financial stability, asset turnover ratio, audit committee’s financial expertise, and profitability is not significant to the fraudulent financial statement. Financial stability, financial targets, level of performance, asset turnover ratio, audited financial audit, and profitability simultaneously have a significant effect on fraud financial statements.

Keywords

fraudulent financial statement fraud score model (F-Score) financial stability financial targets level of performance asset turnover ratio audit committee's financial expertise profitability

Article Details

Licensed under Creative Commons License a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

How to Cite
Pratiya, M. A. M., & Susetyo, B. (2018). Pengaruh Stabilitas Keuangan, Target Keuangan Tingkat Kinerja, Rasio Perputaran Aset, Keahlian Keuangan Komite Audit, dan Profitabilitas Terhadap Fraudulent Financial Statement. Permana : Jurnal Perpajakan, Manajemen, Dan Akuntansi, 10(2), 257-272. https://doi.org/10.24905/permana.v10i2.86

References

  1. Laporan Keuangan Dengan Teori Fraud Triangle. Skripsi Tidak Dipublikasikan, Progdi Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Pancasakti.
  2. Artawijaya, I. N., & Putri, I. A. (2016). Pengaruh Opini Audit Going Concern dan Karakteristik Komite Audit Pada Pergantian Auditor . E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana , 1716-1743 .
  3. Diany, Y. A., & Ratmono, D. (2014). Determinan Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan : Pengujian Teori Fraud Triangle. Diponegoro Journal Of Accounting, Volume 3,
  4. Nomor 2, Tahun 2014, Halaman 1-9. Fimanaya, F., & Syafruddin, M. (2014). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Diponegoro Journal Of Accounting, Volume 3, Nomor 3, Tahun 2014, Halaman
  5. 1-11. Ghozali, I. (2016). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariete dengan Program IBM SPS 23. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
  6. Hanifa, S. I., & Laksito, H. (2015). Pengaruh Fraud Indicators Terhadap Fraudulent Financial Statement. Diponegoro Journal Of Accounting, Volume 4, Nomor 4,Tahun 2015, Halaman 1-15.
  7. Hery. (2016). Analisis Laporan Keuangan Integrated and Comprehensive Edition. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.
  8. Martantya, & Daljono. (2013). Pendektesian Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Melalui Faktor Risiko Tekanan dan Peluang. Diponegoro Journal Of Accounting, Volume 2, Nomor 2, Tahun 2013, Halaman 1-12.
  9. Megawati. 2017. Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Dengan Teori Fraud Triangle. Skripsi Tidak Dipublikasikan, Progdi Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Pancasakti.
  10. Munawir. (2004). Analisa Laporan Keuangan. Yogyakarta: Liberty Yogyakarta.
  11. Prajanto, A., & Pratiwi, R. D. (2016). Pengaruh Budaya Perusahaan dan Rasio
  12. Keuangan Terhadap Fraudulent Financial Statement. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi, Vol. 8, No. 1, Maret 2016, halaman 1-14.
  13. Priantara, D. (2013). Fraud Auditing & Investigation. Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media. ----------------. 2017, 23 Juni. Ketika Skandal Fraud Akuntansi Menerpa British Telecom dan Price Waterhouse Cooper. Warta Ekonomi. Online. https://www.wartaekonomi.co.id. (10 February 2018)
  14. Saputra, R. A. (2016). Pengaruh Fraud Indicators Terhadap Fraudulent Financial Statement. Jurnal Akuntansi Ekonomi dan Bisnis, halaman 1-24.
  15. Sekaran, U. (2006). Metodologi Penelitian untuk Bisnis, Edisi 4 Buku 2. Jakarta: Salemba Empat. Sekaran, U. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian untuk Bisnis Edisi 4 Buku 1. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  16. Sugiyono. (2016). Metode penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.
  17. Windiarti, Ruri. 2015. Pengaruh Financial Targets, Financial Stability, External Pressure, Dan Ineffective Monitoring Terhadap Pendektesian Financial Statement Fraud. Skripsi Tidak Dipublikasikan, Progdi Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Pancasakti. www.ojk.go.id