Article Sidebar

Submitted
May 23, 2020
Accepted
Aug 3, 2020
Published
Aug 16, 2020
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to determine the financial performance using the analysis method of calculating the average of accounts receivable, accounts receivable turnover, and ACP. The study used quantitative descriptive methods. The results of this study indicated that the average accounts receivable period 2016-2017 had increased 10%, while period 2017-2018 decreased 2,0%. Accounts receivable turnover period 2016-2018 had increased 0.56 times and 0.02 times. ACP in 2016 was 34 days and 2017-2018 had dropped to 32 days. Financial Statements of the  Koperasi Republik Mitra Amanah had a total value of 80 and it was considered good. Based on the results of these calculations, these could be concluded that although the financial report was good in Koperasi Mitra Amanah, but the financial performance in Koperasi Mitra Amanah was in a bad condition, it because of the imbalances financial between expenditure and income of the cooperative.

Keywords

Receivable Turnover Average Collection Accounts Receivable

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Licensed under Creative Commons License a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

How to Cite
Yuliyanto, W. (2020). Analisis Pengelolaan Piutang dengan Menggunakan Receivable Turnover dan Average Collection pada Koperasi Republik Mitra Amanah Periode Tahun 2016-2018. Permana : Jurnal Perpajakan, Manajemen, Dan Akuntansi, 12(2), 98-105. https://doi.org/10.24905/permana.v12i2.98

References

  1. Ayem, S., & Nugroho, M. M. (2020). Pengaruh Pemahaman Akuntansi Koperasi Berdasarkan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan Entitas tanpa Akuntabilitas Publik, Tingkat Kompetensi, dan Sistem Pengendalian Intern terhadap Kualitas Laporan Keuangan pada Koperasi Pegawai Republik Indonesia. Permana : Jurnal Perpajakan, Manajemen, Dan Akuntansi, 12(1), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.24905/permana.v12i1.89
  2. Hery 2013, Akuntansi Keuangan Menengah, CPAS, Yogyakarta
  3. Kieso, D, 2009, Akuntansi Intermediate Jilid 1, Erlangga, Jakarta
  4. Munawir, 5 2004. Analisis Laporan Keuangan. Edisi Keempat. Liberty : Yogyakarta
  5. Muslich, M. 2003. Manajemen Keuangan Modern, Analisis, Perencanaan, Dan Kebijaksanan. Jakarta : Penerbit BUMI AKSARA.
  6. Suhadak, S. (2019). Accounting treatment analysis of rahn tasjily financing. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Finance Research, 1(1), 119. https://doi.org/10.21580/jiafr.2019.1.1.3732
  7. Syamsudin, L. 2007. Manajemen Keuangan Perusahaan. Jakarta : PT Raja Grafindo Persada
  8. Wahyuni, Mirasanti, Azmi, F. (2019). The Effect of Macroeconomic Variables on Non Performing Financing in Shariah Commercial Banks. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Finance Research ISSN, 1(1), 250–257. https://doi.org/10.5220/0008439002500257
  9. Wakhid Yuliyanto, Uswatun Hasanah. (2019). Analisis Laporan Keuangan Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Kp-Ri Xyz Periode 2015-2018. Jurnal E-Bis Politeknik Dharma Patria Vol. 3, No. 2 April 2019, ISSN 2580-2062. DOI : https://doi.org/10.37339/e-bis.v3i2.209
  10. Warren, Fees, Reeve, 2005, Pengantar Akuntansi Edisi Ke Dua Puluh Satu, Jakarta : Salemba Empat.
  11. https://www.wawasanpendidikan.com/2017/09/kredit-pengertian-unsur-unsur-fungsi-tujuan-jenis-jenis-serta-prinsip-prinsip-kredit.html (diakses pada 1 februari 2019, pukul 09.00 WIB)
  12. http://www.bukupr.com/2012/03/kolektibilitas-penggolongan-kreditlhtml (diakses pada 5 februari 2019, pukul 12.00 WIB)