Main Article Content

Abstract

This research was intended to examined about the influence of competencies, professional ethics and management control process on performance accountability and academic fraud of teaching accountant. The study was conducted by survey method. The data used in this research were primary data collected by questioners. Based on the results of data analysis and discussion, it was obtained the following research findings: 1) the influence of the competencies, professional ethics and management control process on performance accountability are positive and not significant; 2) the influence of the competencies, professional ethics, management control process and performance accountability on academic fraud of teaching accountant are negative and significant

Keywords

competencies professional ethics performance accountability academic fraud teaching accountant

Article Details

How to Cite
Pamungkas, S., Suratno, & Rachbini, W. (2021). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Etika Profesional dan Proses Pengendalian Manajemen terhadap Akuntabilitas Kinerja dan Fraud Akademik Akuntan Pendidik di Perguruan Tinggi Swasta Wilayah DKI Jakarta. Permana : Jurnal Perpajakan, Manajemen, Dan Akuntansi, 13(1), 9-34. https://doi.org/10.24905/permana.v13i1.156

References

  1. Adams, G. W., et al. (2006). Fraud prevention. The CPA Journal. 76(1), pp 56.
  2. Alam, S. (2011). Pengaruh Kompetensi Akuntan Pendidik, Etika Profesional Akuntan Pendidik Dan Proses Pengendalian Manajemen Terhadap Akuntabilitas Kinerja Akuntan Pendidik Serta Implikasi Terhadap Terjadinya Fraud Akademik Akuntan Pendidik (Survei Pada Akuntan Pendidik Di Lingkungan Kopertis Wilayah IX Sulawesi). Disertasi, Universitas Padjajaran Bandung.
  3. Amin, M. A. N. (2020). Apakah Stock Split Memberikan Keuntungan Tidak Normal?. Permana: Jurnal Perpajakan, Manajemen, Dan Akuntansi, 12(1), 9-17.
  4. Anthony, R N., Vijay, G. (2004). Management Control System. Eleventh Edition, International Edition, McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
  5. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2016). Report to the Nation: Occupational Fraud and Abuse. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners.
  6. Baso, H. M. (2003). Pembinaan SDM Berbasis Kompetensi. Manajemen Usahawan Indonesia 02.
  7. Becker, B. E., Huselid, M. A., & Ulrich, D. (2001). The HR scorecard: Linking people, strategy, and performance. Harvard Business Press.
  8. Bontis, N., Dragonetti, N. C., Jacobsen, K., & Roos, G. (1999). The knowledge toolbox:: A review of the tools available to measure and manage intangible resources. European Management Journal, 17(4), 391-402.
  9. Cattrysse, J. (2005). Reflections on Corporate Governance and the role of the internal auditor. Available at SSRN 485364.
  10. Djuni F., Halim, A. (2015). Pengaruh Etika Profesi, Pengalaman, Tekanan Anggaran Waktu Audit, dan Pemahaman Dilema Etika terhadap Standar Profesi dan Akuntabilitas Profesi Akuntan Publik. Asia Pasific Conference on Accounting and Finance. Universitas Brawijaya, Malang.
  11. Eckstein, M. A. (2003). Combating academic fraud: Towards a culture of integrity. International Institute for Educational Planning.
  12. Farhan, D. (2009). Etika dan akuntabilitas profesi akuntan publik. Inti Media.
  13. Fisher, J. G. (1998). Contingency theory, management control systems and firm outcomes: past results and future directions. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 10 : 47.
  14. Frucot, V., and Winston T. S. (1991). Budgetary participation, locus of control, and Mexican managerial performance and job satisfaction. The Accounting Review, pp 80-99.
  15. Ghozali, I. (2002). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program SPSS. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro Semarang.
  16. Greenhalgh, L., and Zehava R. (1984). Job insecurity: Toward conceptual clarity. Academy of Management Review, 9(3), pp 438-448.
  17. Gumilar R. S, (2006). Himpunan Peraturan Akademik. Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta. http://hpa.ui.ac.id.
  18. Gusnardi, (2008). Pengaruh Peran Komite Audit, Internal Control, dan Internal Audit dalam Pelaksanaan Good Corporate Governance dan Pencegahan Fraud pada BUMN terbuka di Indonesia. Sosiohumaniora, Unpad, Vol. 10 No.2.
  19. Hallak, J., & Poisson, M. (2005). Academic fraud and quality assurance: Facing the challenge of internationalization of higher education. International Institute for Educational Planning, UNESCO.
  20. Hastuti, S. (2007). Perilaku Etis Mahasiswa dan Dosen Ditinjau dari faktor Individual Gender dan Locus of Control. Jurnal Riset Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 7(7), pp 58-73.
  21. Jalal, F, and Supriadi, D. (2001). Reformasi pendidikan dalam konteks otonomi daerah. Yogyakarta: Adicita Karya Nusa.
  22. Kardell, R. L. (2007). Three steps to fraud prevention in the workplace. The Nebraska Lawyer.
  23. Kreitner, R., and Kinicki, A. (2005). Perilaku organisasi. Terjemahan, Salemba Empat, Jakarta.
  24. Lokman, M and Robert H. C. (1994). The usefulness of management accounting systems, functional differentiation and managerial effectiveness. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19(1), pp 1-13.
  25. Miah, N. Z., and Lokman Mia. (1996). Decentralization, accounting controls and performance of government organizations: a New Zealand empirical study. Financial Accountability & Management, 12(3), pp 173-190.
  26. Mulya, A., Rahmatika, D. N., & Kartikasari, M. D. (2019). Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon (Pressure, Opportunity, Rationalization, Competence dan Arrogance) Terhadap Pendeteksian Fraudulent Financial Statement Pada Perusahaan Property, Real Estate and Building Construction yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Permana : Jurnal Perpajakan, Manajemen, Dan Akuntansi, 11(1), 11-25. https://doi.org/10.24905/permana.v11i1.22
  27. Noe, R. A. (2010). Employee training and development. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
  28. Norris, D. M. (1997). Fraud prevention in US foreign aid grants. The Journal of Government Financial Management, 46(3), pp 24.
  29. Nur, A. M. A., & Dadan, R. (2017). Analysis Of Abnormal Return, Stock Return And Stock Liquidity Before And After Buyback Share: Case Study Of Companies Listed In Indonesia Stock Exchange In Period Of 2011-2015. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 71(11).
  30. Pratiya, M. A. M., & Susetyo, B. (2018). Pengaruh Stabilitas Keuangan, Target Keuangan Tingkat Kinerja, Rasio Perputaran Aset, Keahlian Keuangan Komite Audit, dan Profitabilitas Terhadap Fraudulent Financial Statement. Permana : Jurnal Perpajakan, Manajemen, Dan Akuntansi, 10(2), 257-272. https://doi.org/10.24905/permana.v10i2.86
  31. Siregar, Y. (2007). Komitmen Bersama dalam Perusahaan untuk Mencegah dan Mendeteksi Fraud di PT. Astra Internasional Tbk. Economic Business & Accounting Review, Vol. II No. 1.
  32. Sugiyono, P. D. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta CV.
  33. Ulrich, D. (1998). Intellectual capital = competence x commitment. MIT Sloan Management Review, 39 (2), 15.
  34. Utami, A. L., Sumarno, & Fanani, B. (2017). Pengaruh Fraud Triangle terhadap Deteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan pada Perusahaan Perbankan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun Periode 2014-2017. Permana : Jurnal Perpajakan, Manajemen, Dan Akuntansi, 9(2), 150-161. Retrieved from https://permana.upstegal.ac.id/index.php/permana/article/view/145
  35. Virtanen, T. (2000). Changing competences of public managers: tensions in commitment. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 13 (4), pp 333-341.
  36. Wijatno, S. (2009). Pengelolaan Perguruan Tinggi Secara Efisien, Efektif, dan Ekonomis: Untuk Meningkatkan Mutu Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan dan Mutu Lulusan. Salemba Empat, Jakarta.